With only two days left before Election Day, the political landscape in Iowa has taken an unexpected turn. The latest poll from the highly respected Des Moines Register, conducted by renowned pollster J. Ann Selzer, indicates that Vice President Kamala Harris is leading by three points in a state historically dominated by Republicans. This shift has astonished many analysts, as former President Donald Trump previously held a substantial 18-point lead when it was expected that President Joe Biden would run for re-election as the Democratic nominee.
Selzer, known for her accuracy and deep understanding of Iowa’s electorate, acknowledged the surprising nature of the poll results, saying, “It’s hard for anybody to say they saw this coming.” She emphasized that Harris has “clearly leaped into a leading position,” defying earlier assumptions about the state’s political leanings. Her analysis adds weight to the shifting dynamics as Harris makes inroads in what was once considered Trump territory.
On Sunday morning, Trump reacted swiftly, dismissing the poll’s credibility in a fiery statement. “No President has done more for FARMERS, and the Great State of Iowa, than Donald J. Trump. In fact, it’s not even close!” he proclaimed on social media. Referring to the Selzer poll, Trump alleged that it was “heavily skewed toward the Democrats by a Trump hater who called it totally wrong the last time.” To bolster his argument, he cited a separate Emerson poll showing him up by 10 points in Iowa, contrasting it with the Register’s results. Trump ended his response with a message to Iowa’s farmers: “I LOVE THE FARMERS, AND THEY LOVE ME.”
Stay up-to-date with the latest news!
Subscribe and start recieving our daily emails.
The discrepancy between the polls is drawing attention to the various dynamics at play in Iowa. Selzer’s polling is generally regarded as the gold standard in Iowa politics, often reflecting the sentiments of Iowans with a high level of accuracy. However, Trump’s strong support base in Iowa, particularly among rural and farming communities, makes this poll result particularly surprising. The state’s economic ties to agriculture and Trump’s track record of policies favoring farmers have traditionally kept him in good standing with Iowa voters.
As Election Day approaches, these competing poll results add an additional layer of unpredictability. The Selzer poll’s findings indicate that Harris may have gained traction in Iowa by appealing to issues resonant with middle-of-the-road and independent voters. Her campaign’s focus on healthcare, education, and economic opportunities for rural communities could be narrowing the gap in this typically conservative state.
The results of this election may hinge on voter turnout. While Trump’s base is passionate, any shifts among independents or moderates—typically crucial in swing states—could sway Iowa’s outcome. If Harris manages to carry Iowa, it would signal a dramatic shift in the political landscape, demonstrating that key issues like healthcare and education are taking precedence over traditional party loyalty.
With polls as divided as these, both campaigns are likely strategizing down to the wire. If Selzer’s numbers are accurate, Harris could achieve a surprising win in Iowa, a state where Democrats rarely find victory. Conversely, if Trump’s confidence in other polls proves correct, he may once again demonstrate his enduring influence in the Midwest. All eyes are on Iowa, and the outcome remains as uncertain as ever.
Featured image via Political Tribune Gallery
