According to the inspector general’s report released on December 12, 2024, FBI Deputy Director Paul Abbate admitted, “The lack of a canvas was a basic step that was missed,” adding that he had expected it to occur. Despite this oversight, the report acknowledged that the FBI recognized the potential for violence and took “significant and appropriate steps” in preparation for January 6. However, the FBI’s role was described as “supporting,” rather than leading, the effort to manage the events of that day.
The missed intelligence-gathering step could have provided vital information to prevent or better prepare for the Capitol breach. The report’s findings shed light on how the FBI’s internal processes faltered at a critical moment.
Another aspect of the report delved into the FBI’s use of confidential human sources (CHSs) during the events surrounding January 6. The inspector general found that 26 FBI informants were present in Washington, D.C., on that day. Of these, four entered the Capitol, while others remained outside the restricted areas.
The report clarified that none of these informants were “authorized by the FBI to enter the Capitol or a restricted area or to otherwise break the law.” Additionally, only three of the 26 informants were tasked with reporting on specific domestic terrorism cases. The remaining informants attended on their own initiative. The inspector general’s office emphasized that it found “no evidence” suggesting FBI employees instigated or encouraged illegal activities during the riot.
Stay up-to-date with the latest news!
Subscribe and start recieving our daily emails.
Despite these findings, the presence of informants has fueled conspiracy theories, including the “fedsurrection” narrative. This false theory suggests that federal agents orchestrated the Capitol attack. While there is no evidence to support this claim, the idea has gained traction among some groups.
Since January 6, more than 1,500 individuals have been charged in connection with the Capitol attack. However, thousands of others who were present on restricted grounds or inside the building may never face charges. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia stated that it generally declines to prosecute individuals whose only crime was entering restricted grounds without further illegal actions.
The inspector general’s report also highlighted technological and communication challenges within the FBI during this period. These issues further complicated the agency’s ability to address the threat environment effectively.
The findings underscore the importance of thorough intelligence gathering and communication within federal agencies. As Deputy Director Abbate noted, basic steps like canvassing field offices can make a significant difference in understanding and mitigating potential threats.
Featured image via Screengrab