In the video, the journalist makes it clear she’s fed up, stating, “Ever since I saw Ann Coulter say this about Tim Walz’s son who is disabled, I’m gonna say f*** that s***… F*** you, Ann.” She then delivers a scathing critique of Coulter, comparing her to a “decomposing corpse” and referring to her as a “childless monkey woman for Trump.” This wasn’t just a defense of a disabled child but a broader takedown of Coulter’s long history of offensive and divisive comments.
The journalist’s outrage is understandable. Coulter’s comments about Walz’s son aren’t an isolated incident. She has built her career on pushing the boundaries of political decency. From calling 9/11 widows “self-obsessed” and accusing them of “enjoying their husband’s deaths,” to making a repugnant joke about radiation exposure, saying, “If North Korea really were a threat to the United States, why would liberals be worried? Can’t they just move to the radiation-free part of the country?” Coulter thrives on shock and cruelty. She even referred to former President Barack Obama as a “retard” during his tenure, and when criticized for her use of the term, she doubled down instead of apologizing.
The latest comments about Tim Walz’s son are in line with this pattern. Coulter’s tactic—attacking the vulnerable to make headlines—has been a hallmark of her career, but the citizen journalist wasn’t having it. “What the f*** do you know about raising children?” she challenged, pointing out that Coulter, who has no children of her own, is hardly in a position to mock a parent struggling to support their child with special needs.
The journalist’s response doesn’t just reflect frustration with Coulter; it speaks to a broader fatigue with the toxic rhetoric that has increasingly dominated political discourse. Coulter has always walked a fine line between provocation and outright cruelty, and this time, her target—a disabled child—was simply too much for many to stomach. “We are tired of this s***,” the journalist continues in the video. “As Michelle Obama said earlier this week, we’re no longer going high when y’all go low. We’re going to drag your b**** ass to hell where your unseasoned succubus ass belongs.”
Stay up-to-date with the latest news!
Subscribe and start recieving our daily emails.
Her response resonates with a growing number of Americans who are no longer willing to stay silent in the face of what they perceive as inhumane and cruel rhetoric. Coulter’s history of making callous remarks about vulnerable groups has earned her both a loyal fanbase and an ever-expanding list of critics. But what makes this moment unique is the raw anger and passion of the response. The citizen journalist didn’t mince words or try to take the moral high ground. Instead, she matched Coulter’s vitriol with an unapologetic, emotional defense of Tim Walz’s son and an unequivocal rejection of Coulter’s brand of commentary.
Coulter has always prided herself on being an outsider, a provocateur who “tells it like it is.” But as the journalist’s video shows, there’s a growing frustration with figures like Coulter who seem to thrive on dehumanizing others. The political landscape has become more volatile, and for many, Coulter’s attacks feel more like cruelty for cruelty’s sake than legitimate political commentary. While she might argue she’s simply exercising free speech, the cost of that speech—especially when directed at a child with a disability—seems too high for many to accept.
This isn’t just about political correctness. It’s about recognizing that some lines shouldn’t be crossed, and mocking someone’s disabled child is one of them. As the journalist put it, “We are tired of this s***.” And they’re not alone. Across the political spectrum, there’s growing acknowledgment that civility in political discourse is eroding, and figures like Coulter are at the forefront of that decline.
What happens next is uncertain. Coulter will likely brush off the backlash and continue her campaign of provocation, as she has with countless other controversies. But this incident may mark a turning point in how the public responds to such inflammatory rhetoric. The citizen journalist’s raw, emotional outburst represents a broader shift away from passive indignation and toward active confrontation of cruelty in public discourse.
In the end, this viral moment serves as a reminder that words matter, and the way we engage with one another—especially in politics—can have profound consequences. The journalist’s defense of Walz’s son was more than just a reaction to one vile comment. It was a rejection of the dehumanizing politics Coulter represents and a call for something better. And perhaps, in this moment, that call will be heard.
Featured Image via Gage Skidmore and screenshot from video.
