Barron Trump Reportedly At Center Of Bizarre Scheme To Win Greenland For The U.S.

A social media user has suggested marrying off the president's youngest son to deliver Greenland.


573
573 points

For quite a few years, the online right has been exceedingly creepy about Barron Trump, the president’s youngest son. If they’re not fantasizing about who he might date, they’re imagining a weird multi-generational dynasty, which would presumably skip over his four older siblings. And because Barron Trump isn’t much of a public figure and rarely speaks in front of television cameras, they have felt the need to project various qualities onto him.

“MAGA is weirdly thirsty for Barron Trump,” Amanda Marcotte wrote for Salon earlier this week.

“Right-wing media is invested in portraying Barron Trump as a dashing sex symbol and international playboy. It’s so silly that many loyal MAGA posters on X fell for a tweet suggesting that Donald Trump should acquire Greenland by marrying his son off to Princess Isabella of Denmark. It was obviously a joke, but for those who have pickled their brains on the Fox News Cinematic Universe, casting the NYU student and son of a failed fashion model as an American prince made perfect sense. It’s all they’ve been hearing about this lanky teenager for months now,” Marcotte wrote.

That tweet was by an X user named “Ms. White,” who suggested a diplomatic deal involving marrying off the president’s son to the Danish princess:

Many pointed out that the post misunderstands how dowries work:

Meanwhile, social media users had other things to say about the proposal:

Photo courtesy of the Political Tribune media library. 


Stephen Silver
Stephen Silver is an award-winning journalist, essayist and film critic, and contributor to the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Broad Street Review and Splice Today. The co-founder of the Philadelphia Film Critics Circle, Stephen lives in suburban Philadelphia with his wife and two sons. Stephen has authored thousands of articles that focus on politics, technology, and the economy.

Comments