Political Tribune

Analysis, Crime, Opinion

Cybertruck Suspect Shared Email With Chilling Allegations Before Tragic Act Outside Of Trump Vegas Hotel

Things are getting interesting.

596
596 points

A recent shocking revelation regarding the Las Vegas bombing on January 1, 2025, involving a Tesla Cybertruck has caught the attention of both the public and military circles. The man at the center of the story is Matthew Livelsberger, a Green Beret with high-level security clearances and a significant background in military intelligence. Livelsberger sent an email to Sam Shumate, a former U.S. Army intelligence officer, in which he outlined a series of explosive claims. These claims challenge the narrative put forward by the U.S. government and raise critical questions about covert military operations, national security, and the trustworthiness of official statements.

The Two Notes: What Littlesberger Said and the Government’s Response

Before we dive deeper into Livelsberger’s startling allegations, it’s important to reference the two notes he purportedly sent separately, one of which highlighted his concerns about the bombing and the other detailing his involvement in high-level operations.

As reported by the New York Post, Livelsberger’s notes weren’t just about the bombing itself but also about a wider issue: government cover-ups and the involvement of U.S. military agencies in unethical actions. According to Livelsberger, these notes were designed to warn the public about imminent national security threats, including the use of high-tech drones and war crimes committed by U.S. forces in Afghanistan in 2019. His plea for attention to these issues is crucial, as he expressed fear for his own safety while trying to expose the truth.

“What I’m going to send you is going to change the course of humanity,” Livelsberger wrote to Shumate in his first note. His emphasis on the magnitude of the information he was about to share cannot be understated. source

Credit to Shawn Ryan for doing an entire podcast on this; here it is:

Screenshot from Shawn Ryan podcast showing a member of the military giving feedback on Livelsberger :

The Top Five Claims and Our Response

Livelsberger’s email and subsequent communication laid out a series of disturbing claims, which merit a closer look:

  1. Claim of Advanced Drone Technology: Livelsberger claimed that China and the U.S. had been using “gravitic propulsion systems” for drones, capable of evading detection and carrying massive payloads. The implication here is that such advanced technology could be a major national security threat.Response: While we cannot definitively confirm the existence of gravitic propulsion systems, we can’t dismiss the possibility either. What we do know is that there have been numerous reports of mysterious drone activity across the United States, including in New Jersey, where local authorities and residents were baffled by drones that were far beyond the capabilities of conventional models. No one could explain what these drones were or where they came from, leading many to suspect something far more advanced than what we’re used to. The idea that these drones could have military-grade capabilities, including evading detection, seems entirely plausible. It definitely feels like a massive psyop, but we simply don’t know for sure.  Source.
  2. War Crimes in Afghanistan: The email referenced a 2019 airstrike that killed over 100 civilians in Nimrud, Afghanistan, allegedly covered up by the U.S. government. The U.N. report corroborates this claim, highlighting civilian casualties from airstrikes that violated international law.Response: The U.N. report is a critical document, and it aligns with Livelsberger’s accusations. We cannot trust the government’s denials of these events, as there is historical precedent for war crimes being hidden under the guise of national security. The U.S. military’s ability to manipulate narratives is well-documented.  UN Report
  3. The Las Vegas Bombing: Littlesberger detailed the bombing at Trump Tower, which he asserted was a message rather than an attempt at mass murder. He believed that the bombing was an effort to expose government misconduct.Response: It’s difficult to believe that the government’s official stance on this bombing is fully accurate. The fact that no casualties were reported suggests a symbolic nature to the attack, but given the government’s history of obfuscation, we can’t take their word for it.  His own family member states if he wanted to blow up the Trump hotel – he could have taken down half the hotel himself no issue and Livelsberger was a Trump supporter.  Somehow, the body was charred so badly they couldn’t verify his body, but they found his ID in good enough shape at the scene of the bombing …. so I guess we’re good, right?!  😉
  4. Surveillance and Digital Tracking: Littlesberger described being followed by the FBI and Homeland Security. His mention of his phone being digitally tracked mirrors common tactics used against whistleblowers and intelligence operatives.Response: The government has a long history of surveilling its own citizens, especially those with access to sensitive information. Littlesberger’s claim is plausible, given the state of digital surveillance and intelligence gathering in the U.S. Whether it’s for national security or to suppress dissent, the government’s monitoring of its own people is well-established.  It also could be that he’s become a paranoid schizophrenic.  There is no evidence to suggest that, however.
  5. The Threat of World War III: Littlesberger mentioned that his revelations were meant to prevent World War III, which he believed was imminent due to the growing tensions surrounding advanced weaponry and covert operations.Response: While the threat of World War III is an exaggeration, the tension created by secretive military operations, advanced drone technology, and international espionage cannot be ignored. Governments have historically downplayed such threats until they’ve escalated beyond control.  I’ve personally spoken to government employees who have told me personally that a world war is scarily way too close for comfort and actually worse than how things appear.

The Patriot’s Voice: Why Livelsberger Can’t Be Dismissed

One of the most significant factors in considering Livelsberger’s claims is his identity as an active Special Forces operator. A Green Beret, Livelsberger had access to top-secret intelligence programs, giving him insights that most people could never fathom. With years of service under his belt, Livelsberger’s credentials should not be taken lightly. His background and clear dedication to his country suggest that there is no reason to believe he is lying.

While it’s possible that Livelsberger could be experiencing stress due to personal challenges—such as a divorce—the idea that the government is telling the whole truth is far less likely. The U.S. government has lied, misled, and hidden information too many times in the past to take their statements at face value. National security issues are routinely used as a shield for misinformation and disinformation, with the public often the last to know what’s truly happening.

Here’s the email he sent the Shawn Ryan show:

Here’s the email he sent a military friend to explain what was happening:

Is Littlesberger Alive, or Is This a PsyOp?

Fundamentally, we don’t know if Livelsberger is okay or if he’s being paranoid. What we do know is that the government, as seen in previous instances, has a strong motivation to create doubts and control the narrative through misinformation. It’s possible that Littlesberger is caught in the middle of a psychological operation (psyop) designed to either discredit him or manipulate public perception.

“You need to elevate this to the media to avoid a world war…” Livelsberger’s own words are both urgent and alarming. But can we trust them? source

When it comes to intelligence operations, misinformation is a standard tool used to maintain control. As the history of U.S. government actions shows, especially in the realm of national security, misleading the public and obfuscating the truth is a regular course of action. We can’t trust what we’re told by the authorities anymore. This is not a partisan issue—there is a deep state operating within the U.S. government that seeks to maintain its power by any means necessary.

The Fight for Truth

We are at a crossroads. The story of Matthew Livelsberger is not just a tale of one man’s struggle against a corrupt system but a broader commentary on the battle for truth in an age where misinformation reigns. While we cannot definitively confirm every detail of Livelsberger’s claims, we must acknowledge that the government’s past behavior makes it difficult to trust anything they say at face value.

As Alex Jones (yes, he’s insane) often points out, there is indeed a war for information. And in this war, truth is the ultimate casualty. We must all remain vigilant and cautious, questioning what we’re told and never assuming that those in power have our best interests at heart.

Featured image via LinkedIn

, ,

Shay Maz

Posted by

Shay Maz has been a political writer for many years. This is a pseudonym for writing; if you need to contact her - you may do so here: https://x.com/SheilaGouldman

Comments

log in

Captcha!
Forgot password?

reset password

Back to
log in