Trump’s Week Just Got Worse As Federal Appeals Court Strikes Down His Latest Bid

A judge upheld the civil judgment against the president in the E. Jean Carroll case.


573
573 points

In one of several things that would have ended the career of most politicians but failed to prevent Donald Trump’s return to the presidency, Trump had a civil verdict go against him in 2019 for both defaming and sexually abusing magazine writer E. Jean Carroll in the 1980s.

On Monday, a federal appeals court upheld Carroll’s award of $83.3 million from the defamation side of the case. This is not to be confused with the other Carroll case, which went to trial in 2023 and ended with a verdict that Trump had sexually abused Carroll (although it did not find that he had raped her).

Per the New York Times, the court “also rejected Mr. Trump’s argument that the Supreme Court’s decision last year affording presidential immunity for official acts barred a finding of liability in Ms. Carroll’s lawsuit.”

The three-judge panel ruled unanimously in the case.

The panel found that Trump’s side  “has failed to identify any grounds that would warrant reconsidering our prior holding on presidential immunity.” They added that the lower court “did not err in any of the challenged rulings and that the jury’s damages awards are fair and reasonable.”

Per CNN, Trump’s lawyers have signaled that they would ask the Supreme Court to overturn the verdict in Carroll’s other case.

Carroll herself shared a news story about the ruling:

Social media users had a lot to say about the news in the Carroll case:

Photo courtesy of the Political Tribune media library. 

 


Stephen Silver
Stephen Silver is an award-winning journalist, essayist and film critic, and contributor to the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Broad Street Review and Splice Today. The co-founder of the Philadelphia Film Critics Circle, Stephen lives in suburban Philadelphia with his wife and two sons. Stephen has authored thousands of articles that focus on politics, technology, and the economy.

Comments