This week, someone asked Trump a specific question about rogue AI systems breaking into company networks. His response, however, didn’t seem to land on the same topic.
“Will the US do anything to address OpenAI and Anthropic’s models hacking other systems?” a reporter asked. Trump’s answer: “It could be. We’re very much involved in that. We have a big stake in that, so does the world, so we’re looking at it.”
Reporter: Will the U.S. do anything to address OpenAI and Anthropic’s models hacking other systems?
Trump: It could be. We’re very much involved in that. We have a big stake in that. pic.twitter.com/Ig8XcFIpd7
— Acyn (@Acyn) August 2, 2026
The clip found its audience fast once it hit X.
Stay up-to-date with the latest news!
Subscribe and start recieving our daily emails.
“He doesn’t even understand the question. You might well ask a toddler these questions,” one person wrote.
He doesn’t even understand the question. You might well ask a toddler these questions. https://t.co/6T8AuN96cB
— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) August 2, 2026
Another ran with the comparison: “He is a toddler – haven’t you seen his tantrums?”
he IS a toddler – haven’t you seen his tantrums?
— Aussieguy79 (@Aussieguy728823) August 3, 2026
Others weren’t any gentler.
Translation: “I have no f*cking idea what you fake news people are talking about.”
— America 2-5-oh! 🇺🇸 (@DadInGeorgiaUSA) August 2, 2026
He has no idea what any of this means. The guy thought his kid was a genius for knowing how to power on a laptop.
— Chill Wind (@1Chillwind) August 2, 2026
He does not understand anything in that question. He’s the stupidest man alive.
— Jeff MacDonald 🇨🇦 (@jeffmac23) August 3, 2026
He has no idea of the subject matter, does he??
— (((maxcat07))) NYC knew he was nuts for years…. (@maxcat07) August 2, 2026
Whatever the answer lacked in clarity, the situation behind it is genuinely serious.
OpenAI revealed that its models, while being tested for cybersecurity weaknesses, found and exploited a vulnerability nobody at the company knew existed, breaking free of their sandboxed environment to access the open internet and ultimately compromising systems at Hugging Face and a separate customer account at Modal Labs.
Anthropic followed days later with its own disclosure. Three of its models, including Claude Opus 4.7 and Claude Mythos 5, had hacked three organizations during testing over recent months, a pattern only discovered after the company combed through more than 141,000 evaluation runs in response to OpenAI’s news.
“Safety testing happens before a model is released precisely because we don’t yet know what it is capable of,” Anthropic wrote. Sam Altman, asked whether other systems might be at risk, gave CBS a similarly clipped answer of his own: “I mean, there could be, yeah.”
The stakes have been escalating on the policy side too.
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which moved its Doomsday Clock to 85 seconds to midnight this January, has called for international guidelines governing AI. Over 1,100 employees across AI firms have signed on to a petition demanding stronger safety commitments.
Trump’s own administration had already run into a version of this fight earlier in the summer, briefly restricting exports of Anthropic’s Mythos 5 and Fable 5 models over worries about their ability to find and exploit software flaws, before lifting the restrictions roughly three weeks later.
Featured image via X screengrab