Recently, former President Donald Trump criticized radio host Howard Stern after Stern interviewed Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump called Stern a “beta male,” which means he thinks Stern is weak. On his Truth Social account, Trump said, “BETA MALE Howard Stern made a fool of himself on his low rated radio show when he ‘interviewed’ Lyin’ Kamala Harris, and hit her with so many SOFTBALL questions that even she was embarrassed.” This attack shows a bigger problem in the Republican Party: they often see masculinity as being tough instead of being kind and understanding.
Trump’s criticism of Stern raises questions about his own leadership. During his presidency, Trump faced significant criticism for his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported over 600,000 deaths in the United States due to the virus. Many experts argue that more effective leadership could have saved lives. For instance, public health officials had suggested early action to contain the virus, but Trump often downplayed its seriousness. This decision led to confusion and mistrust among the American public.
In contrast, Howard Stern has been open about his views on Trump. During his interview with Harris, he said, “I just don’t know how this election is even close,” referring to the 2020 election. Stern pointed out Trump’s refusal to accept the election results and questioned how someone with such a controversial history could still have strong support among voters. Unlike Trump’s brash style, Stern’s approach emphasizes understanding and dialogue.
Stay up-to-date with the latest news!
Subscribe and start recieving our daily emails.
This interaction between Trump and Stern is not new; we have seen similar situations in history. In the 2004 presidential campaign, then-President George W. Bush often used strong language to describe his opponents, portraying them as weak. This tactic may have energized some voters, but it also created division and stopped constructive conversation.
Many people are starting to notice this pattern in Trump’s behavior. For example, Twitter user @Querydash wrote, “History will have a hard time explaining the mass delusion that caused a huge segment of the American electorate to view DONALD TRUMP as the epitome of masculinity and strength.”
History will have a hard time explaining the mass delusion that caused a huge segment of the American electorate to view DONALD TRUMP as the epitome of masculinity and strength.
— Querydash (@Querydash) October 9, 2024
This comment highlights the disconnect between Trump’s image and the reality of his leadership. Instead of focusing on what truly matters—like the well-being of the nation—Trump often chooses to attack those who disagree with him. Another user, @bryceadvice, tweeted, “No one in the history of the world has ever credited him with very good judgment.” This opinion reflects a growing sentiment that many Americans feel: Trump’s actions do not align with his claims of strength or good decision-making.
No one in the history of the world has ever credited him with very good judgment.
— Bryce McLeay (@bryceadvice) October 9, 2024
As we look forward to the next election, we must think about what kind of leadership we want for our country. Should we prioritize someone who shows toughness and bravado, or someone who is compassionate and understands the issues we face? True strength lies not in insults or attacks but in the ability to listen, learn, and lead.
Featured image via Political Tribune Gallery
