New York Times Columnist Makes Perfect Case For Removing Trump From White House And Not Just By Impeachment

Everyone should read this.

542 points

It’s no secret that Donald Trump does not like the New York Times, but the president is going to be even more irate once he sees what columnist David Leonhardt has just written about him. In a scathing column, Leonhardt makes a powerful case for the removal of Trump from office — and not just by impeachment, which “would probably rally the president’s supporters.” Instead, Leonhardt is calling for a series of public “sober-minded hearings to highlight Trump’s misconduct,” which would put several of Trump’s allies who are seeking reelection “in a very difficult spot.” Leonhardt wrote:

The unrelenting chaos that Trump creates can sometimes obscure the big picture. But the big picture is simple: The United States has never had a president as demonstrably unfit for the office as Trump. And it’s becoming clear that 2019 is likely to be dominated by a single question: What are we going to do about it?

The easy answer is to wait—to allow the various investigations of Trump to run their course and ask voters to deliver a verdict in 2020. That answer has one great advantage. It would avoid the national trauma of overturning an election result. Ultimately, however, waiting is too dangerous. The cost of removing a president from office is smaller than the cost of allowing this president to remain.

He has already shown, repeatedly, that he will hurt the country in order to help himself. He will damage American interests around the world and damage vital parts of our constitutional system at home. The risks that he will cause much more harm are growing…

The biggest risk may be that an external emergency—a war, a terrorist attack, a financial crisis, an immense natural disaster—will arise. By then, it will be too late to pretend that he is anything other than manifestly unfit to lead.

For the country’s sake, there is only one acceptable outcome, just as there was after Americans realized in 1974 that a criminal was occupying the Oval Office. The president must go.”

When Leonhardt talks about Trump’s “misconduct,” he is referring to a long list of wrongdoing, including his flawed and dangerous ideology, his probable collusion with Russia, his “lazy approach to the job” and refusal to do basic job requirements such as reading briefings while leaving “many empty hours on his schedule.” Leonhardt also brings up that Trump used his presidency for his own personal gain.

At the end of this powerful column, Leonhardt urges Republicans to do the right thing for the future of America:

Finally, there is the hope—naïve though it may seem—that some Republicans will choose to act on principle. There now exists a small club of former Trump administration officials who were widely respected before joining the administration and whom Trump has sullied, to greater or lesser degrees. It includes Rex Tillerson, Gary Cohn, H.R. McMaster and Jim Mattis. Imagine if one of them gave a television interview and told the truth about Trump. Doing so would be a service to their country at a time of national need. It would be an illustration of duty.

Throughout his career, Trump has worked hard to invent his own reality, and largely succeeded. It has made him very rich and, against all odds, elected him president. But whatever happens in 2019, his false version of reality will not survive history, just as Nixon’s did not. Which side of that history do today’s Republicans want to be on?”

We can only hope that the GOP is listening.

Featured image via screen capture

Was the crisis in Afghanistan surrounding the pull out of American Troops Biden's fault or Trump's fault?

By completing the poll, you agree to receive emails from Political Tribune and that you've read and agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.

Like it? Share with your friends!

542 points